Source
← Cut review desk
Candidate 044 / 373
Open queue
June 17, 2007 · SM0724
An Eye for an Eye
Matthew 5:38-42 · 44:44
Confidence98%
44:44
Cut points
Proposed trim
In point0:00
Out point40:53
Keeps 0:00-40:53
Editor decision
UnreviewedMarked transcript
Listen against the words
SERMON: 2007-06-17--sm0724--an-eye-for-an-eye-part-1
SOURCE DURATION: 00:44:44.000
PROPOSED CUTS: 1
CONFIDENCE: 0.98
APPROVED: false
REASON: Candidate 5 is the last segment of spoken prayer/pastoral application within the sermon. Candidate 6 marks a clear transition into structured, lyrical material typical of a hymn or song. Acoustic segmentation found sustained music at the end edge and moved the boundary to the adjacent transcript segment.
ACOUSTIC EVIDENCE: available
ACOUSTIC MUSIC INTERVALS: 00:40:53.140-00:44:43.720
ACOUSTIC SPEECH OVERLAP: yes
ACOUSTIC BOUNDARIES APPLIED: end
Inline CUT markers identify each proposed audio boundary after the relevant word.
--- ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT WITH PROPOSED CUTS MARKED ---
Well, let me begin this morning with a question.
When you hear the phrase, "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth," what's the first
thing that comes to mind?
Well, likely the first thing that comes to mind is what we can call the law of retribution.
That is to say, getting even.
You hurt me, I hurt you.
You take from me, I take from you.
You insult me, I insult you in return.
An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, and that certainly is how the Pharisees understood
this passage from the Old Testament.
They were convinced that God, in this Old Testament injunction, not only made allowances
for getting even, but that, in fact, he was commanding us to get even.
An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.
And as is so often the case, they were, however, sadly wrong in their understanding and their
interpretation of this Old Testament passage, and they were wrong for two reasons.
First of all, the passage is addressed corporately and not individually.
Now if you really know your Bibles well, you will know that the phrase "an eye for an eye,
and a tooth for a tooth," and all the other components that were part of it, a life for
a life, and a hand for a hand, and a foot for a foot, and all that sort of thing, that
occurs three times in the Old Testament.
It occurs in Exodus chapter 21, it occurs in Leviticus chapter 24, and it occurs in
Deuteronomy chapter 19.
And in each instance, it is not directed at individuals, but rather it is part of Israel's
legal code.
Exodus 21.1 begins with these words, "These are the laws that you are to set before the
people of Israel."
It is part of Israel's legal code.
Because for Israel as well as for any nation to observe law and order, God has instituted
the power of government.
The power of government involves the legislative branch, the setting of laws that dictate behavior.
Government includes the judicial branch, judges who decide whether you're breaking that law
or not.
And also an area of law enforcement, it's the way God has chosen since the days of Noah
to rule the world.
For people to live together in harmony, evil has to be restrained, righteousness has to
be encouraged, and God's way of doing that among the nations of the world is by establishing
governmental authority.
And so when God in the Old Testament says, "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth,"
he's not talking about personal moral behavior.
No, he is saying, "This is the law that is going to keep the nation from bogging down
into chaos, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth."
The Pharisees made the mistake of taking that which was corporate and applying it to themselves.
That was their first mistake.
Their second mistake was in not understanding that one of the purposes of this legislation
was to uphold justice, that is to say, to make sure that justice was done.
Now listen to me really carefully, because the temptation when you read these phrases
is to say, "You get as good as you give, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth."
That's the part the Pharisees picked up on.
And it is true that governmental authority in the exercise of justice is called upon
to punish evil in correct proportion, eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, so that
people will stand in fear, not give in to their darker impulses, and law and order may
remain in a community or in a society.
But now again, listen very carefully, there is an other side to the question of justice.
And there's another side to tooth for tooth and eye for eye.
And here is what it is, and it's critical to understanding the passage and why Jesus
does what he does with it.
Eye for eye and tooth for tooth also tells us that the punishment ought not to exceed
the crime, because of course that's the tendency of human nature.
You hit me, I hit you back harder.
You hit me back harder, I hit you back harder.
And before you know it, our relationship spirals into an ever-deepening spiral of tit for tat.
And the Old Testament legislation was a legislation that applied to everybody, rich and poor,
slave and free, everybody got treated equally.
Were you punished for your crime?
Yes.
But you were punished for your crime in proportion to the crime that you committed.
Not like, you know, in the days of Victorian England where if you were a poor beggar and
you stole somebody's loaf of bread, they would hang you for stealing that loaf of bread,
a punishment out of proportion to the crime that you had committed.
Very important to understand, and an important area where the Pharisees missed the heart
and the intent of Old Testament legislation.
It was never God's idea in this Old Testament legislation to enable us to carry on vigilante
justice.
Nowhere in scripture do you ever find God authorizing an individual to take matters
of justice into his own hands, because that produces a destruction of the human fabric.
Even David after he was anointed king over Israel, and God was raising him up on the
throne of Israel, didn't dare reach out his hand to the Lord's anointed, but rather waited
out his time for God to exercise judgment illegitimately.
So the Pharisees were wrong, and Jesus comes along in this passage then as he does so often.
And he not only corrects their misunderstanding and their misinterpretation, he takes us back
to the heart of the matter, and that is why he says, "You have heard that it was said
eye for eye and tooth for tooth, but I tell you, do not resist an evil person, if someone
strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also, and if someone wants to sue
you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.
If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from
you."
Now remember I said a few moments ago, this is one of the most controversial passages
in all of scripture, and one of the most misapplied and misinterpreted passages of scripture.
And it is used to justify anything from pacifism to anarchy and everything in between.
A pacifist is a person who believes that it is always wrong to use violence to resist evil.
James Loney, you remember James Loney?
The Christian peacemaker teams activist who some time back had been kidnapped by the rebels
in Iraq and was eventually released.
He was in the news a little while ago, don't know if you heard the story, but absolutely
refuses to go to court and testify at the trial of these kidnappers.
And he gives about two reasons for that.
One is that he doesn't believe the Iraqi justice system is very transparent, but mostly because
he knows these men, if they are convicted, will almost certainly get the death penalty
because they killed, you will recall, one of the people that they had captured.
And he doesn't believe the death penalty ought ever to be applied.
He is a pacifist through and through, based in part on his reading and his understanding
of this particular passage.
And we can respect his position, we can respect the position of many other people who are
pacifists, but you will notice in life that, like most things, it's extremely difficult
to maintain that position consistently when life and liberty are threatened.
We'll talk more about that in a little bit.
Now an anarchist, an anarchist is a person who rejects the rule of law, one who doesn't
believe in governmental authority.
And if you're familiar at all with the famous Russian writer, Leo Tolstoy, you may recall
or know that he is categorized, listen to this, as a pacifist Christian anarchist.
Now that's quite a mouthful.
He's pacifist in the sense that, like GLONI, he doesn't believe in the violent resistance
against evil, and the violence is the important thing to catch up or pick up on there.
And he is an anarchist, and a Christian anarchist, because he doesn't believe that we ought to
have any government except the direct government of God.
And so he rejects having soldiers, he rejects having the judiciary, police, and all that
sort of thing.
And based in part on a reading of this passage where Jesus says, "I tell you, do not resist
an evil person."
And again, we need to be respectful of other people's positions, because many people pay
a high price to walk this out with a degree of integrity.
But that doesn't mean we have to agree with their interpretation of the scriptural passage.
They make in some ways the same mistake the Pharisees and the teachers of the law made
when they looked at this particular passage, because this passage does not talk about a
judicial response to evil.
It doesn't address the issue on a corporate level as to whether a nation ought to have
soldiers take up arms or whether there ought to be legislation against people who are evil.
Now the whole emphasis is on this personal human tendency that we all have that when
we are wronged, we want to fight back and we want to hide under an eye for an eye and
a tooth for a tooth as the Pharisees did.
When Jesus comes to you and to me and he says, "Listen, if you're going to be a follower
of mine, then when you are confronted by injustice and violence in your personal life," he says,
"I want you to learn to develop my mindset instead of fighting back with everything that
is within you.
I want you to learn to so die to yourself that you can trust your Father in heaven to
look after you."
Paul later on put it this way in that famous passage in Philippians chapter 2.
He says, "Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus, who being in the
very nature God did not consider equality with God a thing to be taken by force but
made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant being made in human likeness
and being found in appearance as a man.
He humbled himself and became obedient to death, even death on a cross."
Let me pause here for a moment and just double check with you to see if you're tracking with
me.
This is very critical at the risk of sounding repetitious.
This is not about law and order.
This is not about do you join the military or can you become a policeman?
This is not even about if a robber comes into your house, are you just going to let him
do whatever you want to do?
Again, we'll talk a little bit more about that as time goes on.
No, this is about this human instinct.
You hit me, I hit you, and I'm going to hit you harder than you hit me until we see who's
the boss.
And Jesus says, "I want you to be like me.
I want you to learn not to resist evil, not to give in to that impulse, but to model my
character and my likeness."
Now just to make sure that we understand what it is that he's trying to communicate, Jesus
now goes on and he gives us four practical examples of what this looks like in the real
world.
And the first example that he gives us is that example of turning the other cheek.
He says, "If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also."
And this is one of these phrases that every pagan in North America knows.
It's right up there with judge not lest you be judged.
Turn the other cheek and we all go, "Aha, who in the world is going to do that?"
But now listen carefully, most people are right-handed.
And if somebody who is right-handed strikes you on the cheek, what cheek are they going
to hit?
Not your right cheek, but your left cheek.
You say, "What's the significance of that?"
Well, I'll tell you what the significance of that is.
If a right-handed man or woman is going to slap you on your right cheek, they either
have to go through this kind of contortion or more likely they are back-handing you like
this.
Now a back-hander does two things.
Number one, it hurts more because now you're getting hit with a knuckle and it carries
an additional element of insult because it's dismissive.
Any slapping in the face is an insulting experience, but to be walloped like this is even more
dismissive than being walloped like this.
And just as an offside, it's for that reason that I recommend parents never to slap their
children in their face because slapping always contains an element of humiliation and insult.
If your child needs discipline, then do it properly in the place that the Lord has designed
for some good experience of discipline.
Now this business of being hit on the cheek refers to personal injury and insult not only
of a physical nature but also of an emotional nature.
And what is your natural reaction when somebody hurts you like that?
And it doesn't even have to be a slap in the face, it can just be a slight in passing,
it can be a critical voice, it can be a place where, well, you know what happens?
Our sinful self rises up, experiences pain, and nobody needs to teach you and me to become
angry and to want to fight back, isn't that true?
And whether or not we actually take and have the courage to step into that and to get even,
or whether we just suffer in silence, or whether we ever have the opportunity to step into
it and get even, our hearts do a slow burn.
And that kind of resentment, that kind of anger, that kind of, you know, I want to get
even with you, that can linger in our hearts for a long, long period of time because it
offends our sense of justice.
We have been wronged and hell hath no fury like people that have been wronged.
Now here's what Jesus says, "When somebody hits you on the right cheek, turn to him the
other also."
That is to say, on the one hand, he says, "I want you to get rid of this whole notion
that you're the most important person in the universe and that you have a right to feel
the way that you're feeling.
I want you to so learn to die to yourself and to be alive in Christ that how you live
your life in relationship with other people is not determined by, am I going to be kept
safe and feel good in the midst of this?
If need be in obedience to God, I will step out and experience suffering and pain if need
be for the glory of God."
Because you see, that's what Jesus did.
He didn't fight back when it came to personal injury or to personal insult.
And you can all understand how much we need Jesus and how much we need the power of the
Holy Spirit to transform our hearts if you consider just how easily we get our dinder
up and how we want it our own way.
Now does that mean you just let anybody beat you up that wants to beat you up?
Does that mean if a robber comes into your house and they want to take everything that
you've got, you just stand by and sing glory hallelujah songs?
Well, no, obviously not.
And if not today, then at some other point, Lord willing, we'll look at the practical
outworkings of that.
This has nothing to do with law and order.
This has nothing to do with restraining evil in society.
This has everything to do with my heart and my attitude when I'm personally being mistreated.
Are you with me on this?
Very important to understand because we're called to be the followers of Jesus.
And this is how he lived.
Even those we'll see later on, he was not a pacifist.
He took on evil and was not afraid to judge it or to condemn it.
All right, as if that's not clear enough, he now goes on to give us a second illustration
and he says, if somebody wants to take your tunic by suing you, then let him have your
cloak as well.
Now a tunic is like an undergarment.
It's like a shirt and your cloak, of course, is your coat.
And under Old Testament law, you could sue somebody for their tunic, presumably because
they had more of them, but you could never sue them for their overcoat.
You could take their overcoat as surety or a guarantee, a pledge for what they owed you,
but only for one day.
And you had to return it by nightfall.
You know why?
Because that might be the only blanket that he would have for that night.
And so you were not allowed to take it from him.
And so this issue that Jesus is raising here about suing for a tunic and giving him your
coat not only deals with our attitude towards possessions, but more especially our attitude
towards security.
And again, what happens when somebody threatens your security or my security?
Well, in Adam, outside of the grace of God, we immediately become protective.
We live in a world where we know that our security lies in getting the things in life
we need that make us safe and secure, and then by trying to hold onto them as best as
we can.
And when somebody comes along and he threatens that security, takes away my financial stability,
takes away my shelter, takes away my, you know, the fortress within which I hide and
where I find my stability.
Well then, number one, our anxiety goes through the roof.
And number two, we try to desperately hold on to what we have and we will scrap and fight
to keep somebody from taking from us what it is that we have.
And Jesus says, if you're going to be one of my people, if you believe in a father in
heaven who looks after the birds of the air and the lilies of the field, then you begin
to understand that your security in life does not come from all the things in which we hide
and on which we lean.
The security of life, he says, comes from your father who is in heaven, who has promised
to look after you and to provide all of your needs.
And so instead of having this grabbing, clutching response and attitude, he says, you can let
it go.
Why?
Because you know that your father in heaven is going to look after you better than you
can look after yourself.
Again, does that mean injustices don't matter?
Does that mean we just let anybody clean us out?
No, that's not the issue.
The issue is what is happening in my heart?
Am I anxious?
Am I clinging?
Am I hanging in there for all that it's worth?
Or do I have the attitude of Jesus who emptied himself knowing that our exaltation comes
from God the Father?
You see why Jesus doesn't have a lot of followers.
You see why living the Christian life, according to the Sermon on the Mount, really takes the
power of God's Holy Spirit because it runs contrary to every inkling, every tendency,
every impulse of the human heart.
Well, Jesus is concerned that we don't get it.
So he gives us still a third example.
And that is the example of going the extra mile.
He says if someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
And this deals with our attitude towards legislation, particularly when it's unfavorable.
The phrase "extra mile" comes from a provision under the Roman rule that if a group of Roman
soldiers had a load that needed to be carried and they didn't want to carry it themselves,
they could take anybody they ran across in the population and force them to carry the
load.
But they could only carry it one mile.
Because remember, the Romans were sticklers for law and order.
And to keep that law from being abused, it was limited to going that one mile.
And the primary biblical example of somebody being forced to carry a load is who?
Simon of Cyrene, when Jesus was on the way to Golgotha, and he could no longer carry
the cross.
But Simon was there watching this take place, and so they picked him out of the crowd, and
they made him carry the cross.
That's the legislation that's being talked about here.
Now you can imagine that was pretty unpopular.
And you can well imagine you're busy with your daily activities, and along comes this
Roman soldier, and he doesn't just say, "Well, you know, please can you help me and I'll
pay you double time."
No, it's like you get over here, drop what you're doing, carry my load, and carry it
all the way for that mile.
Now if you've ever been in a situation where somebody tried to tell you what to do, when
you were doing something else, and you didn't like it, what happens inside?
Well, I don't need to spell it out, do I?
You don't exactly sit there going, "Glory, hallelujah, Lord, God Almighty, I thank you
for this opportunity to serve my hated conquerors."
Would you?
No, I think you'd rather sit there and you say, "Go to, you know where."
And if you had no way out, which probably you wouldn't, if you didn't want to lose
your head, you'd carry that load saying some pretty nasty things in your head.
And when you came to that mile marker, you knew your mile was up, and you would drop
the load, spit on the ground, and hightail it out of there, because you knew you had
done your distasteful duty.
Now that's natural, and Jesus, he comes along and he says, "Well, you know, anybody can
live that way."
But he says, "If you're going to be my disciple, you know what I want you to do?
I want you to go the extra mile.
Not only do I not want you to grumble that mile that you have to serve, but I want you
to have an entirely different attitude towards injustice, an entirely different attitude
towards how you're being treated.
What a testimony it would be to the Romans if a Jew would do that load cheerfully, and
what a testimony it would be to the world today if you and I, instead of being all bent
out of shape because things aren't going our way, we would go the extra mile.
The kid who says, "I'll not only do your dishes, Mom, I'll clean the floor," oh,
that would be a miracle now, wouldn't it?
Or the husband who says, "I'll not only cook the meal today, but why don't you take the
rest of the week off and I look after the kids."
That also would be a miracle now, wouldn't it?
You can multiply example upon example, and you begin to get the drift of what Jesus is
getting at.
So, he says, "Turn the other cheek, let them take your cloak, go the extra mile."
Then he says, in connection with the lending of money, here's how he puts it, "Give to
the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you."
And this, of course, deals with our sense of ownership.
It more specifically deals with our financial stability than does the tunic and the cloak,
although there is some overlap in these two areas.
What happens when you and I are confronted by somebody in need?
Well, if we feel generous and if we have enough, then maybe we'll give a little bit, particularly
if it makes us feel good about ourselves.
But if it threatens our own security, threatens our own stability, then our sense of self-justification,
our sense of, "This is mine.
I worked for this.
You don't have a right to this."
It all kicks in and it dictates to us what we do and not the will of God as revealed
in scripture and worked out through us by the Holy Spirit.
Now again, does that mean we just indiscriminately squander our resources, give literally to
everybody who begs from us or who is in need?
That's not the issue.
And again, we'll come back to that Lord willing at a later date.
The real issue is my attitude of possessiveness, my attitude that says, "This is my security.
This is what I worked for.
This is what is mine and I can do with it what I want to do."
And Jesus says to you and to me, "You want to belong to me?
You want to demonstrate faith in a living God who has promised to meet all the needs
of his children according to the riches of his glory in Christ Jesus?"
Then he says, "You'll learn to die to this sense of ownership.
This sense of my own wellbeing is my primary agenda."
Now then you begin to understand that everything that we have is a trust given to us by God
that he wants us to be good stewards of for his glory and he wants us to use it in faith
to honor him and to meet the needs of others.
And to just illustrate this, I want to come back one more time to the story of Hudson
Taylor.
Talked about Hudson Taylor, you will recall, last week converted in England in the middle
of the last century.
Hudson upon his conversion felt called to go to the mission field in China.
And as a young man, as he was preparing to go to the mission field, he was going through
the disciplines that he needed to go through to live in a strange country among a foreign
people without any visible means of support.
And so he was not only learning the medical arts and learning to do with as little as
he could, but he was also learning to walk by faith and trusting that God would meet
his need.
And so he tells the story very soon upon his Christian conversion that became pivotal in
his life to learn to trust God for all of his needs.
He met a man one Sunday night as he was engaged in ministry who asked him to come see his
sick and dying wife because they were poverty stricken.
And here is how Hudson Taylor tells it in his own words, "Up a miserable flight of stairs
into a wretched room, he led me.
And oh, what a sight there presented itself to our eyes.
Four or five poor children stood about, their sunken cheeks and temples all telling unmistakably
the story of slow starvation, and lying on a wretched pallet, a poor exhausted mother
with a tiny infant, 36 hours old, moaning rather than crying at her side.
Oh, thought I, if I had two shillings and a sixpence instead of half a crown, which
is all the possession that he had left, how gladly should they have one and sixpence of
it, or half of it.
But still a wretched unbelief prevented me from obeying the impulse to relieve their
distress at the cost of all I possessed.
It will scarcely seem strange that I was unable to say much to comfort these people.
I needed comfort myself.
I began to tell them, however, that they must not be cast down, that though their circumstances
were very distressing, there was a kind and loving father in heaven, but something within
me said, "You hypocrite," telling these unconverted people about a kind and loving
father in heaven, and not prepared yourself to trust him with half a crown.
I was nearly choked.
To talk was impossible under these circumstances, yet strange to say, I thought I should have
no difficulty in praying.
You asked me to come and pray with your wife, I said to the man, "Let us pray."
And I knelt down, but scarcely had I opened my lips with our father who art in heaven.
Then conscience said within, "Dare you mock God?
Dare you kneel down and call him father with that half crown in your pocket?"
And such a time of conflict came upon me then as I have never experienced before or since.
How I got through that form of prayer I know not, but I rose from my knees in great distress
of mind.
The poor father turned to me and said, "You see what a terrible state we're in, sir?
If you can help us, for God's sake, do it."
Just then the words flashed into my mind, "Give to him that asks of you."
And in the word of a king there is power.
I put my hand into my pocket, and slowly drawing forth the half crown, gave it to the man.
The joy all came back in full flood tide to my heart.
I could say anything and feel it then, and the hindrance to blessing was gone, gone.
I trust forever.
And he goes on to say, "Not only was the poor woman's life saved, but I realized that
my life was saved, too.
It might have been a wreck.
Would have been a wreck, probably, as a Christian life had not grace at that time conquered
and the strivings of God's spirit been obeyed.
I well remember how that night as I went home to my lodging, my heart was as light as my
pocket.
The lonely deserted streets resounded with a hymn of praise, which I could not restrain
when I took my basin of porridge before retiring.
I would not have exchanged it for a princess feast.
I reminded the Lord as I knelt at my bedside of his own word, that he who gives to the
poor lends to the Lord.
I asked him not to let my loan be a long one, I like that, for I should have no dinner the
next day.
And with peace within and peace without, I spent a happy and restful night."
The story goes on to say that the next morning's meal brought him a gift four times as great
as he had given to the poor family.
And Hudson Taylor goes on to say, "I then and there determined that a bank which could
not break should have my savings or earnings as the case might be, a determination I have
not yet learned to regret.
If we are faithful to God in little things, we shall gain experience and strength that
will be helpful to us in the more serious trials of life."
It was that experience coupled with a number of other similar experiences that established
in his mindset the determination to trust God for all that he would need on the foreign
mission field.
And I said last week by the time he died, some 51 years later, 800 and some missionaries
were laboring in China, over 200 preaching stations were established, and hundreds of
thousands of converts had come to faith in Jesus.
All because he had learned to turn the other cheek, to let people take his cloak, to go
the extra mile, and to give to those who needed it more than he did. [CUT]
[PROPOSED CUT 1 START at 00:40:53.140; remove through 00:44:44.000]
He changed, renewed, flowing from the grace that I found in you.
And Lord, I've come to know the weaknesses I see in me.
I know that everything will be stripped away by the power of your love.
Oh Lord, because let your love surround me.
Bring me near, draw me to your side, And let our ways, our lives up like the air,
and I will soar with you, your spirit leads me on, in the power of your love.
Lord, unveil my eyes, let me see your face, to face the knowledge of your love, as I
live in peace.
And Lord, renew my life, and as you will unfold in my life, in living every day, by
the power of your love.
Oh Lord, because let your love surround me.
Bring me near, draw me to your side, And as I wait, I'll rise up like the eagle,
and I will soar with you, your spirit leads me on, in the power of your love.
And I will soar with you, your spirit leads me on, in the power of your love. [CUT]
[PROPOSED CUT 1 END at 00:44:44.000; resume after this marked segment]